AgenticX5 by GenAISafety

HSE Data Preparation Guide

Comprehensive guide for preparing data for AI projects in industrial occupational health and safety. Built on international standards and industry best practices.

1.2M+
OHS Incidents
100+
AI Agents
95%
Metadata Coverage
24/7
Real-time Monitoring
πŸ“š

1. Introduction & Objectives

Purpose and scope of this HSE data preparation guide

β–Ό
πŸ“Œ Guide Purpose
This guide provides a comprehensive framework for preparing, managing, and validating HSE (Health, Safety & Environment) data for artificial intelligence projects in the AgenticX5 ecosystem.

🎯 Main Objectives

βœ…

Data Quality

Ensure high quality, complete, accurate, and consistent HSE data to maximize the effectiveness of AI-based solutions.

πŸ”„

Interoperability

Implement international standards (Dublin Core, DDI, ISO 11179) to facilitate data exchange and cross-jurisdictional harmonization.

πŸ”

Compliance

Respect privacy regulations (Law 25, GDPR) and OHS standards (ISO 45001, C-25) to ensure ethical governance.

⚑

Scalability

Design a modern data architecture (Modern Data Stack) capable of handling millions of records in real-time.

πŸŽ“ Target Audience

  • Data Scientists: To understand data structure and prepare ML/AI features
  • Data Engineers: To implement robust and automated data pipelines
  • HSE Specialists: To validate semantic quality and compliance of data
  • Project Managers: To plan and coordinate data preparation phases
  • Governance Teams: To ensure compliance and traceability
πŸš€ Expected Benefits
  • Reduction in data preparation time by 60%
  • Improvement in model accuracy by 25%
  • Increase in metadata coverage to β‰₯95%
  • Complete data lineage for 100% auditability
🏷️

2. Metadata Standards & Dublin Core

International standards for interoperability and data discovery

β–Ό

πŸ“‹ International Standards

🌐

Dublin Core (DC)

Priority 1 Universal

Lightweight and generic metadata schema with 15 core elements, widely used for data discovery and exchange. Ideal for cross-domain interoperability.

  • Coverage: Title, Creator, Subject, Description, Publisher, Date, Type, Format, Identifier, Source, Language, Relation, Coverage, Rights
  • Use Cases: Data catalogs, open data portals, digital archives
πŸ“Š

DDI (Data Documentation Initiative)

Research Advanced

Detailed standard for documenting research and statistical data. Ensures methodological reproducibility and traceability.

  • Coverage: Study design, sampling methods, variable definitions, processing workflows
  • Use Cases: Scientific datasets, surveys, longitudinal studies
πŸ—‚οΈ

ISO 11179

Semantic

International standard for metadata registries. Ensures consistency, semantic coherence, and data quality.

  • Coverage: Data element definitions, controlled vocabularies, concept relationships
  • Use Cases: Enterprise data dictionaries, data governance
πŸ“

DCAT (Data Catalog Vocabulary)

Open Data

RDF vocabulary for describing data catalogs and datasets. Facilitates aggregation and federation of data portals.

  • Coverage: Dataset descriptions, distributions, access endpoints, temporal coverage
  • Use Cases: Government open data portals, data marketplaces

πŸ”‘ Dublin Core - 15 Core Elements

Element Description Example (OHS Incident)
dc:title Title or name of the resource Fall from height - Construction Site A
dc:creator Entity responsible for creating the resource CNESST Inspector - Jean Tremblay
dc:subject Topic or keywords Fall, Construction, Safety, Prevention
dc:description Abstract or summary Worker fell 3 meters from scaffold due to missing guardrails
dc:publisher Entity responsible for making the resource available CNESST - QuΓ©bec
dc:contributor Entity contributing to the resource Site Safety Manager
dc:date Date associated with the resource 2024-03-15T14:30:00Z
dc:type Nature or genre of the resource Incident Report
dc:format File format or media type application/json
dc:identifier Unique identifier CNESST-2024-001234
dc:source Related resource from which the current resource is derived Initial investigation report #98765
dc:language Language of the resource fr-CA (French - Canada)
dc:relation Related resource Safety alert #2024-045
dc:coverage Spatial or temporal coverage Montreal, QC / Q1 2024
dc:rights Information about rights Β© CNESST 2024 - Confidential
πŸ’‘ Practical Tip
Dublin Core allows each element to have qualifiers to refine its meaning. For example:
  • dc:date.created vs dc:date.modified
  • dc:coverage.spatial vs dc:coverage.temporal

πŸ”— Multi-Jurisdictional Harmonization

πŸ“ Industry Classifications

To ensure interoperability between Canada, USA, and Europe:

Country/Region Classification Description Examples
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada NAICS (SCIAN) North American Industry Classification System 221122 - Electric Power Distribution
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ USA SOC Standard Occupational Classification 47-2061.00 - Construction Laborers
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί Europe NACE Statistical Classification of Economic Activities 35.13 - Distribution of Electricity
βœ… Data Sources - AgenticX5
  • 793,000+ CNESST incidents (QuΓ©bec) - NAICS Classification
  • 220,000+ OSHA incidents (USA) - SOC Classification
  • 150,000+ EU-OSHA incidents (Europe) - NACE Classification
  • Automatic mapping between the 3 taxonomies via harmonization tables
πŸ“Š

3. HSE Data Types - Detailed Inventory

Common and industry-specific data types for OHS

β–Ό

🚨 3.1 Incident & Accident Data

Key Attributes

  • Unique ID: CNESST-2024-001234
  • Date/Time: ISO 8601 format (2024-03-15T14:30:00Z)
  • Location: GPS coordinates + facility address
  • Incident Type: Controlled taxonomy (fall, entrapment, chemical exposure, etc.)
  • Severity: 1-5 scale or lost time days
  • Individuals Involved: Number + roles (anonymized)
  • Injuries: Nature, location, diagnosis (ICD-10)
  • Root Causes: Immediate + systemic (Bowtie Analysis)
  • Contributing Factors: Environmental, organizational, behavioral
  • Corrective Actions: Description + responsible + deadline
  • Follow-up Status: Open, In Progress, Closed
  • Regulatory References: Violated regulations
Example JSON:
{
  "id": "CNESST-2024-001234",
  "dc:identifier": "CNESST-2024-001234",
  "dc:title": "Fall from height - Construction Site A",
  "dc:date": "2024-03-15T14:30:00Z",
  "dc:creator": "CNESST Inspector - Jean Tremblay",
  "dc:type": "Incident Report",
  "dc:subject": ["Fall", "Construction", "Safety"],
  "dc:coverage.spatial": "Montreal, QC",
  "incidentType": "FALL_HEIGHT",
  "severity": 4,
  "injuries": [{"type": "FRACTURE", "location": "left_arm", "icd10": "S42.0"}],
  "rootCauses": ["MISSING_GUARDRAILS", "INADEQUATE_SUPERVISION"],
  "correctiveActions": [{
    "description": "Install compliant guardrails on all scaffolds",
    "responsible": "Site Manager",
    "deadline": "2024-03-30"
  }]
}

πŸ” 3.2 Inspection & Audit Data

Key Attributes

  • Inspection ID: Unique tracking number
  • Date: Inspection date
  • Type: Planned, reactive, regulatory
  • Scope: Equipment, process, site
  • Inspector(s): Name + certification
  • Checklist Used: Reference to standard template
  • Findings: Compliant / Non-compliant items
  • Observations: Detailed notes
  • Risk Rating: For each finding
  • Recommendations: Prioritized actions
  • Photographic Evidence: References to images
  • Follow-up Date: Next inspection date

⚠️ 3.3 Risk Assessment Data

πŸ“‹

Risk Analysis

  • Analysis ID
  • Workstation / Activity
  • Identified Hazards (taxonomy)
  • Probability (1-5 scale)
  • Severity (1-5 scale)
  • Risk Level (Probability Γ— Severity)
  • Existing Controls
  • Proposed Controls
  • Residual Risk
5Γ—5 Matrix HAZOP
πŸ‘οΈ

Behavioral Observations

  • Observation ID
  • Date/Time
  • Zone Observed
  • Safe Behaviors (count)
  • At-Risk Behaviors (count)
  • Behavior Details
  • Feedback Provided
  • Follow-up Actions
BBS

πŸ› οΈ 3.4 Equipment & Hazardous Materials

Critical Equipment Inventory

  • Equipment ID: Unique identifier
  • Name/Description
  • Precise Location
  • Serial Number
  • Manufacturer
  • Commissioning Date
  • Equipment Type (taxonomy)
  • Criticality Level (1-5)
  • Inspection Frequency
  • Inspection History
  • Related Incidents
  • Current Status
  • Certifications

Hazardous Materials Inventory

  • Product ID: CAS number / IUPAC name
  • Quantity & Unit
  • Location
  • Hazard Classification (GHS)
  • SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
  • Storage Conditions
  • Expiration Date
  • Emergency Procedures
GHS SIMDUT

πŸŽ“ 3.5 Training & Certifications

  • Training ID
  • Training Title
  • Type (induction, refresher, specialized)
  • Duration
  • Trainer(s)
  • Participants (anonymized list)
  • Completion Date
  • Assessment Results
  • Certificate Issued
  • Expiration Date
  • Regulatory Requirements
βœ… Best Practices
  • Use controlled taxonomies for all categorical fields
  • Implement unique identifiers with consistent format
  • Document all relationships between datasets
  • Maintain complete audit trails for all modifications
  • Ensure privacy compliance for personal data
πŸ”„

4. Data Preparation Process - 6 Phases

From collection to production deployment

β–Ό
πŸ“₯

Phase 1: Collection

  • Source identification
  • API/ETL setup
  • Initial ingestion
  • Raw storage (Bronze)
Week 1-2
🧹

Phase 2: Cleaning

  • Duplicates removal
  • Missing values handling
  • Outliers detection
  • Format normalization
Week 2-3
πŸ—οΈ

Phase 3: Structuring

  • Schema definition
  • Taxonomy mapping
  • Relationship modeling
  • Partitioning strategy
Week 3-4
βœ…

Phase 4: Validation

  • Quality tests
  • Business rules verification
  • Statistical validation
  • Anomaly detection
Week 4-5
πŸ“

Phase 5: Documentation

  • Dublin Core metadata
  • Data dictionary
  • Lineage tracking
  • Version control
Week 5-6
πŸ’Ύ

Phase 6: Storage

  • Gold layer deployment
  • Feature store setup
  • Backup strategy
  • Access control
Week 6+

πŸ“Š Modern Data Stack Architecture

πŸ›οΈ Layered Architecture

Layer Description Technologies Format
πŸ₯‰ Bronze Raw data, as-is from sources S3, Azure Blob, GCS JSON, CSV, Parquet
πŸ₯ˆ Silver Cleaned and validated data Delta Lake, Iceberg Parquet (partitioned)
πŸ₯‡ Gold Curated and business-ready Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks Tables optimized for analytics
⭐ Feature Store ML-ready features Feast, Tecton, SageMaker Optimized for ML serving
πŸ’‘ Key Principle
Never modify Bronze layer data - maintain complete traceability from source to final features. All transformations must be reproducible and versioned.
πŸ› οΈ

5. Technology Stack & Tools

Modern tools for data preparation and quality assurance

β–Ό

πŸ”§ Essential Tools by Category

πŸ”„

Orchestration & Pipelines

  • Apache Airflow: Workflow automation and scheduling
  • Prefect: Modern dataflow orchestration
  • Dagster: Data pipeline development framework
  • dbt (data build tool): SQL-based transformation workflows
Recommended
βœ…

Data Quality & Validation

  • Great Expectations: Automated testing framework
  • Pandera: Statistical data validation for pandas
  • Deequ: Data quality library for Spark (Amazon)
  • ydata-profiling: Automated EDA reports
Priority
πŸ“Š

Data Catalog & Lineage

  • DataHub (LinkedIn): Metadata platform
  • Amundsen (Lyft): Data discovery & metadata engine
  • OpenLineage: Open standard for data lineage
  • Atlas (Apache): Metadata framework
Governance
πŸ€–

MLOps & Model Registry

  • MLflow: Model lifecycle management
  • Weights & Biases: Experiment tracking
  • DVC (Data Version Control): Git for data/models
  • Feast: Feature store
ML Pipeline

πŸ’» Example Code: Data Quality Pipeline

Great Expectations - Quality Suite

import great_expectations as gx
from great_expectations.dataset import PandasDataset

# Initialize context
context = gx.get_context()

# Load HSE incident data
df = pd.read_parquet('silver/incidents_2024.parquet')

# Create expectations
expectations = {
    'expect_column_to_exist': ['incident_id', 'date', 'severity'],
    'expect_column_values_to_be_unique': ['incident_id'],
    'expect_column_values_to_not_be_null': ['date', 'incident_type'],
    'expect_column_values_to_be_between': {
        'severity': {'min_value': 1, 'max_value': 5}
    },
    'expect_column_values_to_be_in_set': {
        'incident_type': ['FALL', 'CHEMICAL', 'ENTRAPMENT', 'FIRE']
    }
}

# Run validation
results = context.run_validation_operator(
    'action_list_operator',
    assets_to_validate=[df],
    expectation_suite_name='hse_incidents_suite'
)

# Generate report
if results['success']:
    print("βœ… All quality checks passed!")
else:
    print("❌ Quality issues detected:")
    for result in results['run_results']:
        print(f"  - {result['expectation_config']['expectation_type']}: FAILED")

dbt - Data Transformation

-- models/silver/incidents_cleaned.sql
{{ config(
    materialized='incremental',
    unique_key='incident_id',
    partition_by={'field': 'date', 'data_type': 'date'}
) }}

WITH source_data AS (
    SELECT * FROM {{ ref('bronze_incidents') }}
    {% if is_incremental() %}
    WHERE date >= (SELECT MAX(date) FROM {{ this }})
    {% endif %}
),

cleaned AS (
    SELECT
        incident_id,
        PARSE_TIMESTAMP('%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S', date) AS timestamp,
        UPPER(TRIM(incident_type)) AS incident_type,
        CAST(severity AS INT64) AS severity,
        NULLIF(TRIM(location), '') AS location,
        -- Dublin Core metadata
        incident_id AS dc_identifier,
        CONCAT('Incident Report - ', incident_type) AS dc_title,
        timestamp AS dc_date,
        'CNESST' AS dc_publisher,
        'Incident Report' AS dc_type
    FROM source_data
    WHERE severity BETWEEN 1 AND 5
        AND incident_type IS NOT NULL
)

SELECT * FROM cleaned
🎯 Recommended Stack for AgenticX5
  • Orchestration: Apache Airflow + dbt
  • Quality: Great Expectations + ydata-profiling
  • Storage: Snowflake (Gold) + S3 (Bronze/Silver)
  • Lineage: OpenLineage + DataHub
  • MLOps: MLflow + Feast
  • Monitoring: Prometheus + Grafana
πŸ”

6. Governance & Compliance

Privacy, security, and regulatory compliance

β–Ό

πŸ“œ Regulatory Framework

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

QuΓ©bec - Law 25

Mandatory

Private Sector Privacy Law

  • Explicit consent for data collection
  • Impact assessments for sensitive data
  • Breach notification (72h)
  • Right to access, rectification, deletion
  • Privacy by design
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

Europe - GDPR

International

General Data Protection Regulation

  • Lawful basis for processing
  • DPIA (Data Protection Impact Assessment)
  • Right to portability & erasure
  • Data minimization principle
  • DPO (Data Protection Officer)
🏒

ISO 45001

OHS Standard

Occupational Health & Safety Management

  • Risk assessment documentation
  • Incident investigation procedures
  • Performance monitoring metrics
  • Worker participation & consultation
  • Continuous improvement
βš–οΈ

Bill C-25

AI Governance

Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (Canada)

  • High-impact AI system assessment
  • Algorithmic transparency
  • Bias mitigation requirements
  • Human oversight mechanisms
  • Accountability framework

πŸ”’ Privacy & Security Best Practices

Data Minimization & Anonymization

  • Pseudonymization: Replace identifiers with pseudonyms
  • Aggregation: Use statistical summaries instead of individual records
  • Differential Privacy: Add statistical noise to protect individuals
  • K-anonymity: Ensure each record is indistinguishable from k-1 others
  • Data retention limits: Automatic deletion after regulatory period
# Example: K-anonymity implementation
from anonymizedf.anonymizedf import anonymize

anon = anonymize(df)
anon.categorical_columns(['location', 'job_role'])
anon.numeric_columns(['age'], method='binning', bins=5)
anon_df = anon.to_dataframe()

# Verify k-anonymity
k_value = anon_df.groupby(['location', 'job_role', 'age_bin']).size().min()
print(f"K-anonymity value: {k_value}")  # Should be >= 5

Access Control & Auditing

  • RBAC (Role-Based Access Control): Permissions by role
  • ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control): Dynamic access based on attributes
  • Audit logs: Complete tracking of all data access and modifications
  • Encryption: At-rest (AES-256) and in-transit (TLS 1.3)
  • MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication): For all data access

πŸ“Š Quality Metrics & KPIs

Metric Target Measurement Frequency
Completeness β‰₯ 95% (Non-null values / Total values) Γ— 100 Daily
Accuracy β‰₯ 98% (Valid records / Total records) Γ— 100 Weekly
Consistency β‰₯ 97% (Consistent records / Total records) Γ— 100 Weekly
Timeliness ≀ 24h Time between event and ingestion Real-time
Uniqueness 100% (Unique IDs / Total records) Γ— 100 Daily
Metadata Coverage β‰₯ 95% (Fields with metadata / Total fields) Γ— 100 Monthly
⚠️ Critical Compliance Checkpoints
  • βœ… Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) completed before data collection
  • βœ… Data Processing Agreement (DPA) signed with all vendors
  • βœ… Consent management system implemented
  • βœ… Data breach response plan documented and tested
  • βœ… Regular security audits (quarterly minimum)
  • βœ… Staff privacy training (annual)
βœ…

7. Validation Checklist

Pre-deployment quality assurance checklist

β–Ό
πŸ“‹

Data Quality

  • ☐ All primary keys are unique and non-null
  • ☐ No duplicate records in the dataset
  • ☐ Missing values below 5% threshold
  • ☐ All dates in ISO 8601 format
  • ☐ Categorical values match controlled vocabulary
  • ☐ Numeric values within expected ranges
  • ☐ Text fields properly encoded (UTF-8)
  • ☐ Outliers identified and documented
🏷️

Metadata

  • ☐ All 15 Dublin Core elements populated
  • ☐ Data dictionary created and published
  • ☐ Schema versioned and documented
  • ☐ Lineage tracked from source to gold
  • ☐ Taxonomy mappings documented
  • ☐ Data provenance recorded
  • ☐ Update frequency specified
  • ☐ Data owner identified
πŸ”

Privacy & Security

  • ☐ PII data anonymized or pseudonymized
  • ☐ K-anonymity >= 5 for sensitive data
  • ☐ Access controls configured
  • ☐ Encryption enabled (at-rest & in-transit)
  • ☐ Audit logging activated
  • ☐ Data retention policy applied
  • ☐ Privacy impact assessment approved
  • ☐ Consent documented
🎯

Technical Validation

  • ☐ Great Expectations test suite passing
  • ☐ dbt tests passing (100%)
  • ☐ Data profiling report generated
  • ☐ Performance benchmarks met
  • ☐ Partitioning strategy implemented
  • ☐ Indexes created on key columns
  • ☐ Backup and recovery tested
  • ☐ Monitoring dashboards deployed
πŸŽ‰ Ready for Production
Once all checklist items are completed, your HSE data is ready for deployment in the AgenticX5 AI ecosystem. Don't forget to schedule regular audits and updates!
πŸ“š

8. References & Resources

Standards, documentation, and further reading

β–Ό

πŸ“– International Standards

Metadata & Interoperability

OHS & Quality Standards

  • ISO 45001: Occupational Health & Safety Management Systems
  • ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems
  • ANSI Z10: Occupational Health & Safety Management Systems
  • OHSAS 18001: (superseded by ISO 45001)

πŸ› οΈ Tools & Platforms

πŸ“œ Regulatory Resources

πŸ“š Further Reading

  • Kleppmann, M. (2017). Designing Data-Intensive Applications. O'Reilly Media.
  • Reis, J., & Housley, M. (2022). Fundamentals of Data Engineering. O'Reilly Media.
  • Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data Science for Business. O'Reilly Media.
  • GΓ©ron, A. (2019). Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow. O'Reilly Media.
πŸ’‘ Stay Updated
This guide will be updated regularly to reflect:
  • New regulatory requirements
  • Emerging tools and technologies
  • Feedback from AgenticX5 implementations
  • Industry best practices evolution